Inbox Overload: Email Bombing Attacks Hide Bigger Threats

Written by ProArch | Sep 29, 2025 5:14:27 AM

At a Glance

  • Email Bombing campaigns overwhelm inboxes with thousands of junk emails.
  • Attackers exploit user frustration to launch help desk impersonation scams.
  • SOC observed misuse of Quick Assist for unauthorized remote access attempts.
  • Attackers use automation and randomization to evade spam filters.

Executive Summary

Email Bombing (also called “Email Blast” or “Inbox Stuffing”) has re-emerged as a disruptive tactic against enterprises. At first glance, the attack looks like an ordinary spam flood, but it often serves a dual purpose:

  1. To distract users and hide critical alerts (e.g., account takeovers, subscription confirmations).
  2. To enable social engineering follow-ups, where scammers impersonate IT or Microsoft support and trick victims into granting remote access.

While the initial wave may appear harmless or annoying, the real risk lies in post-bombing engagement, which can lead to credential theft, data compromise, and financial fraud.

What’s Happening?

The Email Bombing Tactic

  • Attackers use automated tools to send thousands of emails to a single target in a short span.
  • Subjects and senders vary randomly to bypass filters.
  • Bulk messages are often redirected to Junk/Spam, but enough slip through to overwhelm users.

The Social Engineering Angle

  • Once frustration sets in, attackers call or email the victim, posing as IT support.
  • They claim to “fix the spam issue” and guide users to use Quick Assist (or similar remote tools).
  • Users are tricked into sharing session codes, granting attackers full remote access.
  • In some observed cases, attackers hid password reset or MFA alerts under the flood of spam.

Why This Matters to Our Clients

  • Operational Disruption: Users spend hours sorting inboxes instead of working.
  • Distraction Risk: Real alerts (e.g., financial fraud, account takeovers) may be missed.
  • Social Engineering Escalation: Remote access via Quick Assist = full device compromise.
  • Brand Damage: Employees misled by impersonators could lose trust in internal IT.

ProArch SOC Observations

  • Recent case: Targeted user received thousands of emails in a short timeframe.
  • 99% landed in Junk folder, but user was still overwhelmed.
  • SOC confirmed spammer IPs and domains were blocked, inbox cleaned as much as possible.
  • Follow-up calls impersonating Microsoft support were attempted post-attack.
  • This aligns with global threat intel reporting spikes in email bombing-for-distraction campaigns.

Recommendations

User Awareness:

  • Educate employees to recognize fake IT/Microsoft calls after email floods.
  • Reinforce: IT/SOC will never ask users to install or share Quick Assist codes with external parties.

 Technical Defences:

  • Enhance spam filter rules with bulk-detection thresholds.
  • Implement mailbox protection tools that flag sudden surges.
  • Monitor for unusual account activity during/after bombing events.

Response Playbook:

  • If email bombing is detected, SOC to block sending IPs/domains and purge affected inboxes.
  • Encourage users to report any post-attack calls or emails claiming to be IT/Microsoft.
  • Escalate suspicious Quick Assist or remote tool use for forensic review.